Publikationen

Dieser Beitrag beabsichtigt eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit anti-genderistischen Darstellungen von queer-christlichen Gottesdiensten anhand einer Analyse von Social Media Daten und diskursethnographischer Feldforschung. Diesbezüglich wird eingangs mit Bezug auf aktuelle Forschungsliteratur das Konzept des ›Anti-Genderismus‹ erörtert und auf kirchenpolitische Kontexte bezogen.

This contribution deals with the contradictions of nature and agricultural economy in the contemporary moment of crisis in the Anthropocene. It is based on an analysis of the fantastic French film La nuée (The Swarm) by Just Philippot who reflects by this film also on the turning points from the preception of reality to obsession and from the uninjured body to the damaged body, or even from live to death resepctiveley from live instinct to death drive.

In this article, the proposal is made to analyse practices of contradiction with regard to their aesthetic potential. On the one hand, this is intended to demonstrate the diverse possibilities of contradiction studies and, on the other, to emphasise the role of aesthetic texts in protest discourses. Texts from the feminist abortion discourse will be used as examples.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic problems in the global health system. It revealed that the global health system perpetuates global health inequalities rather than effectively reducing them: The international community, particularly the countries of the Global North, failed to make COVID-19 vaccines widely available to the populations of the world’s poorest countries. This blog debate takes stock of the reform debate about a just and decolonizing transformation of the health system. Bringing together scholars from various disciplines, the contributions of this debate ask what a fair global health system could look like and what role the law plays in it.

The need for reform of the global health system is openly on the table. Many stakeholders agree that the WHO has not been able to adequately address the political and social problems, global health emergencies triggered or exacerbated by epidemics and pandemics, malnutrition, and access to clean water in recent years. Against this backdrop, there is a widespread call for more equity and solidarity in the global health system.

“Contradiction” is a core concept in the humanities and the social sciences. Beside the classical ideas of logical or dialectical contradiction, instances of “lived” contradiction and strategies of coping with it are objects of this study. Contradiction Studies discuss the many ways in which explicit or implicit contradictions are negotiated in different political or cultural settings. This volume collects articles that tackle the concept of contradiction, practices of contradicting and lived contradictions from a number of relevant perspectives and assembles contributions from linguistics, literary studies, philosophy, political science, and media studies.

Ausgehend von der Omnipräsenz beschönigender Rede über Zuhören fragt der Essay nach dem Beziehungsgeflecht von Zuhören und Diskurs. Einem verbreiteten Mythos, in dem Zuhören isoliert als replikative Handlung verstanden wird und Unwägbarkeiten des Zuhörens systematisch überdeckt sind, wird die Annahme gegenübergestellt, dass Zuhören Sprache im Widerspruch ist und als solche konstitutiv für Diskurse und vice versa. Gefragt wird nach Möglichkeiten einer Soziolinguistik des Zuhörens und insbesondere nach einer konzeptionellen Einordnung des Zuhörens im Spannungsfeld von Positivität der Rede und Intentionalität des Zuhörens. Ich spreche von Diskursphänomenologie, ohne zu übersehen, dass damit eine auch wissenschaftshistorische Gegenüberstellung von Diskursanalyse und Phänomenologie aufgebrochen wird.

Verfassungsblogbeitrag: Das Freihandelsabkommen der EU mit Neuseeland verpasst die Etablierung eines kritischen Nachhaltigkeitsbegriffs.

Tagungsband zum Symposium Zeit · Geist · Gehirn. Neurowissenschaft und Zeiterleben 2021.

Die Krisenhaftigkeit demokratischer Ordnung und gesellschaftlicher Naturverhältnisse im Zeitalter des Kapitalozäns belebt Debatten um Wirtschaftsmodelle jenseits kapitalistischer Marktwirtschaft gegenwärtig wieder.

Bringing together memory studies with the emerging field of contradiction studies, in this article, I suggest the need for an alternative way of thinking about collective memory by juxtaposing the ideal of wholeness that necessarily underlies any group’s identity with that of the inevitable contradiction of the plurivers. I discuss the power of the Western narrative order in regard to the Haitian Revolution and examples of mnemonic disharmony in contemporary Germany and seek to illuminate the epistemic violence constitutive of this narrative order. The article therefore interrogates memory study’s epistemological foundation and the practices in which these underpinnings result. The aim is to highlight the potential of contradiction in an attempt to pluriversify responses to the past as well as future visions for the worlds we live in. Special attention is paid to the question of what it is we hope for when attempting to (scholarly) contribute to making collective memory more inclusive, and where the limitations of this might lie. The purpose of my contribution, then, is to explore the tacit imperative of harmony that often remains unchallenged in memory studies, and to propose a shift in focus, from the ways in which memory might help us understand (e.g., current clashes of identities), toward a research agenda that is considerate of its own entanglements with power, yet, at the same time, lives up to its potential to contribute to transformation.

This book provides an analysis of the forms and functions of Holocaust memorialisation in human rights museums by asking about the impact of global memory politics on how we imagine the present and the future. It compares three human rights museums and their respective emplotment of the Holocaust and seeks to illuminate how, in this specific setting, memory politics simultaneously function as future politics because they delineate a normative ideal of the citizen-subject, its set of values and aspirations for the future: that of the historically aware human rights advocate. More than an ethical practice, engaging with the Holocaust is used as a means of asserting one’s standing on „the right side of history“; the memorialisation of the Holocaust has thus become a means of governmentality, a way of governing contemporary citizen-subjects. The linking of public memory of the Holocaust with the human rights project is often presented as highly beneficial for all members of what is often called the „global community“. Yet this book argues that this specific constellation of memory also has the ability to function as an exercise of power, and thus runs the risk of reinforcing structural oppression. With its novel theoretical approach this book not only contributes to Memory Studies but also connects Holocaust memory to Studies of Global Governmentality and the debate on decolonising memory politics.

This book contributes to the study of oceans, seas, coastal waters, and rivers within blue humanities by broadening, circulating, and interweaving knowledge about such waters, ocean epistemologies, and sea narratives from pluriversal epistemological, geographical, cultural, and disciplinary perspectives. The contributors from Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Europe, North America and the Pacific explore the interconnections between oceans, coastal areas, rivers, humans, animals, plants, organisms, and landscapes in the fields of cultural history and cultural studies, critical race and postcolonial studies, marine and environmental studies, linguistics, literature, film and media studies.

Das Verhältnis von Mensch und Natur unterliegt einem ständigen Wandel. Galt die Natur lange als bedrohlich und fremd, entwickelte sich im 16. Jahrhundert die Idee vom Menschen im Einklang mit der Natur. Eine erneute tiefgreifende Veränderung dieses Verhältnisses geht mit der Industrialisierung und rapiden Urbanisierung seit dem 19. Jahrhundert einher. Die Mensch-Natur-Beziehungen geraten aus dem Gleichgewicht und gefährden das Überleben vieler Spezies, auch die des Menschen, auf diesem Planeten. Die seit den 1960er Jahren anhaltende Umwelt-debatte konnte daran bis heute nur bedingt etwas verändern. Vielmehr scheint eine anhaltende Unfähigkeit – ein „blind spot“ – zu bestehen, sozio-ökologische Beziehungen zu unserem Lebensraum (wieder) herzustellen und zu unterhalten. Es stellt sich die dringliche Frage, wie wir uns wieder an die Natur annähern können und welche Strategien dafür hilfreich erscheinen.