Beiträge

Buchcover Spaces of Dissension

Carving out the paradoxes of underground urban infrastructure, this paper attempts to establish a dialog between infrastructure studies, on the one hand, and Contradiction Studies, on the other hand. It starts from the premise that the technical and political characteristics of infrastructure are only thought of and made visible in case of failure or breakdown. It is thus only through their eventual absence that infrastructures gain a certain presence. This first paradox is both doubled and bedeviled in the case of underground infrastructure which, despite “lying low” in geographical terms, bars itself from being placed “underneath” in symbolic terms. It is argued that it is precisely the uncanniness of underground infrastructure that prevents the latter from being taken for granted and rendered invisible. The theoretical arguments are then illustrated by a discussion of AMFORA, a speculative urban design concept for the city center of Amsterdam. The paper concludes by discussing some of the lessons that can be learned from an exploration of the unhomely for a theorization of contradictions which aims at challenging simplistic conceptualizations of the contradictive.

In Julia Lossau, Daniel Schmidt-Brücken & Ingo H. Warnke (Hrsg.), Spaces of Dissension (Contradiction Studies), 237–255. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25990-7_12

relational

»Zunächst dachte ich, Widerspruch ist immer eine relationale Sache; je mehr ich aber darüber nachdenke, um so eher meine ich, Widerspruch ist relationierend.«

Ingo H. Warnke
Motor

„Widerspruch ist ein wichtiger Motor wissenschaftlicher Praxis und Erkenntnis. Ihn besser zu verstehen kann helfen, unsere Realitätsfähigkeit zu steigern.“

Norman Sieroka
Widerspruch benennen

»Widerspruch wird da real, wo jemand Widerspruch benennt.«

Ingo H. Warnke
Afterlife of colonialism

“Contradiction comes in many different forms. None is so debilitating than when the coloniser transitions, textually not politically, to decoloniality without taking the responsibility for the afterlife of colonialism, which they continue to benefit from. Self-examination and self-interrogation of the relations of coloniality, a necessity, seem nearly impossible for the coloniser who continues to act as beneficiary, masked in the new-found language of White fragility, devoid of an ethical responsibility of the very system of White domination they claim to be against.” (Black Consciousness and the Politics of the Flesh)

Rozena Maart
Zwischenraum

„Der Widerspruch des Rechts bei Derrida liegt in dem Zwischenraum, der die Unmöglichkeit einer Dekonstruktion der Gerechtigkeit von der Möglichkeit der Dekonstruktion des Rechts trennt.“

Andreas Fischer-Lescano