GRK Contradiction Studies Logo

This paper discusses how the category of declarative speech acts can be used in the context of discourse analysis. For this purpose, similarities as well as differences between the works of Searle and Foucault are being discussed in order to illustrate the possibilities and challenges of theorizing declarative speech acts as discursive practices. To elaborate on these problems, a study on the felicity conditions of marriage in Islamic as well as Christian cultures is critically reviewed. The paper ends with an analysis of the discourse of same-sex marriage as well as blessing ceremonies in German churches and the discursive conflicts revolving around those practices.


Trochemowitz, Jonas. 2025. Declarative Speech Acts as a Discursive Practice of Disruption: An Analysis of Same-Sex Marriage and Blessings in German Church Discourse. Discourse in/of Disruption (Diskurs – interdisziplinär 12) 9, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.21248/idsopen.9.2025.48

Zurück zur Übersicht
täglich

„Leben in Widersprüchen ist das, was wir täglich erleben. Warum wissen wir darüber so wenig?“

Gisela Febel
Motor

„Widerspruch ist ein wichtiger Motor wissenschaftlicher Praxis und Erkenntnis. Ihn besser zu verstehen kann helfen, unsere Realitätsfähigkeit zu steigern.“

Norman Sieroka
ein (aufzu)lösendes Problem

„Widerspruch ist oft nicht primär ein (aufzu)lösendes Problem, sondern eine Antriebskraft, ohne die es nicht geht.“

Martin Nonhoff
Gefängnis der Differenz

„‚Widerspruch ist das Gefängnis der Differenz‘ schreibt der französische Philosoph Gilles Deleuze. Worlds of Contradiction fragt: wie können wir die Welt erklären und beschreiben, ohne sie kohärenter und systematischer zu machen, als sie ist?“

Michi Knecht
Afterlife of colonialism

“Contradiction comes in many different forms. None is so debilitating than when the coloniser transitions, textually not politically, to decoloniality without taking the responsibility for the afterlife of colonialism, which they continue to benefit from. Self-examination and self-interrogation of the relations of coloniality, a necessity, seem nearly impossible for the coloniser who continues to act as beneficiary, masked in the new-found language of White fragility, devoid of an ethical responsibility of the very system of White domination they claim to be against.” (Black Consciousness and the Politics of the Flesh)

Rozena Maart