Buchcover "Inspecting the Interview: A Companion"

Against the backdrop of general considerations of the interview as a genre, the paper discusses under which theoretical conditions interviews are suitable instruments for discourse analysis. With a special interest in questions of the linguistic constitution of shared knowledge in discourse, the authors outline the discourse-linguistic status of interviews in a systematic way. Based on a discourse analytical characterization of the genre of the interview, the preliminary assumptions of the present paper are tested through a pilot study which deals with the question of the contemporary state of democracy. This explorative European interview project documents and demonstrates the possibilities of a computerassisted interpretation of the discursivity of interviews. The paper thus makes a fundamental contribution to the further exploration of discourse-linguistic methods, to discussions about the current state of democracy, as well as to reflections on the interview as a complex research genre in its interdisciplinary dimensions, including digital-humanities methods.


In Carsten Junker (eds.), Inspecting the Interview: A Companion, 201–248. Berlin: De Gruyter.

print
ISBN: 9783111086231

DOI:
doi.org/10.1515/9783111086484-012

Zurück zur Übersicht
Motor

„Widerspruch ist ein wichtiger Motor wissenschaftlicher Praxis und Erkenntnis. Ihn besser zu verstehen kann helfen, unsere Realitätsfähigkeit zu steigern.“

Norman Sieroka
Widerspruch benennen

»Widerspruch wird da real, wo jemand Widerspruch benennt.«

Ingo H. Warnke
Erdung

„Die fachwissenschaftliche Geographie steht für eine gewisse Erdung der Widerspruchsthematik sowohl in theoretischer als auch in praktischer Hinsicht.“

Julia Lossau
Dekoloniale Wissensproduktion

„Dezentralisierende und dekolonisierende Wissensproduktion über Widerspruch, widersprüchliche Phänomene und widersprechende Prozesse ist eine herausfordernde Aufgabe.“

Kerstin Knopf
Afterlife of colonialism

“Contradiction comes in many different forms. None is so debilitating than when the coloniser transitions, textually not politically, to decoloniality without taking the responsibility for the afterlife of colonialism, which they continue to benefit from. Self-examination and self-interrogation of the relations of coloniality, a necessity, seem nearly impossible for the coloniser who continues to act as beneficiary, masked in the new-found language of White fragility, devoid of an ethical responsibility of the very system of White domination they claim to be against.” (Black Consciousness and the Politics of the Flesh)

Rozena Maart