Cover of the Aptum Magazine. 2024

The aim of this article is to theoretically substantiate antonymy as a discourse-linguistic category and to analytically examine it. The central question here is how antonymic relations are grammatically constituted in discourse and what communicative functions they fulfill. Following this interest, the main empirical part of the paper presents a case study on antonymy in grammatical constructions consisting of modal verbs, negations and two-part adversative connectors. A central result of the study is that the discourse-grammatical constitution of antonymy entails different functions for political discursive communication. Against this background, we argue that the study of antonymy provides important insights for discursive conceptions of contradictions and therefore offers a rewarding interface for interdisciplinary collaboration between linguistics and Contradiction Studies.


In Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 20 (01), 41–70.

print
ISBN: 978-3-96769-433-8

DOI:
10.46771/9783967694345_3

Back to overview
every day

“Living in contradictions is what we experience every day. Why do we know so little about it?”

Gisela Febel
relational

“At first I thought contradiction was always a relational thing; but the more I ponder it, the more I think contradiction creates relation.”

Ingo H. Warnke
diversity and plurality

“Join us to create more diversity and plurality in knowledge production.”

Gisela Febel
Is contradiction eurocentric?

“Is contradiction a eurocentric concept, operational phenomenon, and instrument of power?”

Kerstin Knopf
earthing

“Geography as a discipline stands for a certain worlding, if not earthing, of contradiction, in both theoretical and pracitcal respect.”

Julia Lossau