Poster for the WoC GradNet Lecture Series #4: Labeling Theory in Language and Sexuality Studies

WOC GradNet Lecture #4: Labeling Theory in Language and Sexuality Studies

Heiko Motschenbacher (Western Norway University of Applied Sciences)

11/12/2024 2:15 pm –3:45 pm

U Bremen GRA 4 (Grazer Straße 4) 0110 & online

In his talk Heiko Motschbacher seeks to make a theoretical contribution to the field of language and sexuality (Motschenbacher 2022). His goal is to use the sociological approach of labeling theory (Becker 1963) to inform discussions in language and sexuality studies. On the one hand, it is argued that labeling theory has certain advantages that make it a useful tool for the analysis of language and sexuality (for example, its performative conceptualization of language, its grounding in social interactionism, its view of deviance as socially produced, and its ability to capture sexual normativity). On the other hand, it is pointed out that the approach has some weaknesses in its original form that would need to be addressed to make it suitable for studies on language and sexuality (its historical roots in the sociology of deviance, its failure to cover norm-conforming labeling and labeler motivations, and its neglect of linguistic insights). The importance of labeling in the field of language and sexuality is illustrated by a discussion of earlier studies on sexual labeling (e.g. Karr 1978), with studies adopting a social psychological perspective (e.g. Fasoli, Maass & Carnaghi 2015) and studies on self-labeling practices (White, Moeller, Ivcevic & Brackett 2018) playing a central role.

For questions and and digital participation contact trochemo@uni-bremen.de

References

  • Becker, Howard S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. London: The Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Fasoli, Fabio; Maass, Anne & Carnaghi, Andrea (2015). Labelling and Discrimination: Do Homophobic Epithets Undermine Fair Distribution of Resources? British Journal of Social Psychology 54 (2), 383–393.
  • Karr, Rodney G. (1978). Homosexual Labeling and the Male Role. Journal of Social Issues 34 (3): 73–83.
  • Motschenbacher, Heiko (2022). Linguistic Dimensions of Sexual Normativity: Corpus-Based Evidence. London: Routledge.
  • White, Arielle E.; Moeller, Julia; Ivcevic, Zorana & Brackett, Marc A. (2018). Gender Identity and Sexual Identity Labels Used by U.S. High School Students: A Co-occurrence Network Analysis. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity 5 (2): 243–252.
Back to overview
paradox

“The basis of law is not an idea as a systematic unified principle but a paradox.”

Andreas Fischer-Lescano
diversity and plurality

“Join us to create more diversity and plurality in knowledge production.”

Gisela Febel
hierarchy of norms

“If social contradictions are reflected in law, law cannot form a hierarchy of norms free of contradictions.”

Andreas Fischer-Lescano
Afterlife of colonialism

“Contradiction comes in many different forms. None is so debilitating than when the coloniser transitions, textually not politically, to decoloniality without taking the responsibility for the afterlife of colonialism, which they continue to benefit from. Self-examination and self-interrogation of the relations of coloniality, a necessity, seem nearly impossible for the coloniser who continues to act as beneficiary, masked in the new-found language of White fragility, devoid of an ethical responsibility of the very system of White domination they claim to be against.” (Black Consciousness and the Politics of the Flesh)

Rozena Maart
driver

“Contradictions are an important driver of scientific practice and knowledge.”

Norman Sieroka