Bookcover of "Politisierung des Alltags. Strategische Kommunikation in öffentlichen Diskursen". You can see the title and a cutout of people demonstrating.

Politisierung als Delegitimation. Zur anti-genderistischen Darstellung und Lebenswirklichkeit queer-christlicher Gottesdienste

Article / Paper

Jonas Trochemowitz

2024

This article aims to critically examine anti-genderist representations of queer Christian church services by analyzing social media data and discourse ethnographic field research. In this regard, the concept of ‘anti-genderism’ is first discussed with reference to current research literature and related to church policy contexts. For the analysis of the social media contributions, four YouTube videos on queer Christian church services and their comments are examined with regard to the conceptual connection between religious and anti-genderist arguments. This analysis is then contrasted with the results of a discourse-ethnographic field study on queer church services. The central thesis of the article is that the anti-genderist criticism of queer Christian church services can be understood as a form of delegitimizing politicization, which in its own discourse logic must hide the experiences and voices of the actors concerned.

In Forschungsgruppe Diskursmonitor (eds.), Politisierung des Alltags. Strategische Kommunikation in öffentlichen Diskursen. Siegen: Universitätsverlag.


ISBN: 978-3-96182-178-5

Back to overview
paradox

“The basis of law is not an idea as a systematic unified principle but a paradox.”

Andreas Fischer-Lescano
power and resistance

“Michel Foucault says: “Where there is power, there is resistance, and […] this resistance is never in a position of exteriority in relation to power” (History of Sexuality I, The Will to Knowledge, 1976, p. 95)”

Gisela Febel
sustained engagement

“The history of Western philosophy can be understood as a sustained engagement with contradiction.”

Norman Sieroka
coherence in thought

“The imperative of non-contradiction generally produces a coherence in thought that is often at odds with social complexities.”

Yan Suarsana
Afterlife of colonialism

“Contradiction comes in many different forms. None is so debilitating than when the coloniser transitions, textually not politically, to decoloniality without taking the responsibility for the afterlife of colonialism, which they continue to benefit from. Self-examination and self-interrogation of the relations of coloniality, a necessity, seem nearly impossible for the coloniser who continues to act as beneficiary, masked in the new-found language of White fragility, devoid of an ethical responsibility of the very system of White domination they claim to be against.” (Black Consciousness and the Politics of the Flesh)

Rozena Maart