Cover of the Aptum Magazine. 2024

The aim of this article is to theoretically substantiate antonymy as a discourse-linguistic category and to analytically examine it. The central question here is how antonymic relations are grammatically constituted in discourse and what communicative functions they fulfill. Following this interest, the main empirical part of the paper presents a case study on antonymy in grammatical constructions consisting of modal verbs, negations and two-part adversative connectors. A central result of the study is that the discourse-grammatical constitution of antonymy entails different functions for political discursive communication. Against this background, we argue that the study of antonymy provides important insights for discursive conceptions of contradictions and therefore offers a rewarding interface for interdisciplinary collaboration between linguistics and Contradiction Studies.


In Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 20 (01), 41–70.

print
ISBN: 978-3-96769-433-8

DOI:
10.46771/9783967694345_3

Back to overview
diversity and plurality

“Join us to create more diversity and plurality in knowledge production.”

Gisela Febel
prison of difference

“‘Contradiction is the prison of difference‘ writes the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze. Worlds of Contradiction asks: how can we explain and describe the world without making it more coherent and systematic than it is?”

Michi Knecht
power and resistance

“Michel Foucault says: “Where there is power, there is resistance, and […] this resistance is never in a position of exteriority in relation to power” (History of Sexuality I, The Will to Knowledge, 1976, p. 95)”

Gisela Febel
earthing

“Geography as a discipline stands for a certain worlding, if not earthing, of contradiction, in both theoretical and pracitcal respect.”

Julia Lossau
sustained engagement

“The history of Western philosophy can be understood as a sustained engagement with contradiction.”

Norman Sieroka